International

Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Foundation©

"Dedicated To Helping RSD Patients Worldwide"

Eric M. Phillips

P.O. Box 1145

Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 USA

Phone: 508-946-9888  Fax: 508-946-3338

 

Office Hours

Monday through Friday

9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. EST

 

Please view the following new topics:Dr.Ellen G. Wattay's Updated Manual for the Diagnosis and Treatment of RSD/CRPS I,  Clinical Contribution To CRPS I, RSD Poems, RSD Stories, Clinical Trials: Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I and CRPS,  Sympathectomy, and The National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI).

Home Background About RSD RSD Puzzles #1-146 Cryotherapy Venipuncture CRPS Thermography Part - I Thermography Part- II Nerve Block Abstract CRPS - Sympathectomy Microcirculation Clinical Contribution On-line RSD Survey Printable RSD Survey RSD References RSD and Pregnancy Social Security Ruling RSD and SSDI Clinical Trials Dental Referrals Photonic Stimulator RSD Medical Articles RSD Articles List RSD Article #1 RSD Article #2 RSD Article #3 RSD Article #4 RSD Article #5 RSD Article #6 RSD Article #7 RSD Article #8 RSD Article #9 RSD Article #10 RSD Article #11 RSD Article #12 RSD Article #13 RSD Article #14 RSD Article #15 RSD Article #16 RSD Article #17 RSD Manual For P.T.'s Medical Journal Links In The News Support Group Info RSD Events Links Language Translator Updates E-mail Search RSD Info Request RSD Poems RSD Stories RSD Tissue Research Medical Record Review

 

RSD Article # 15

 chapter
7

REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY
CAUSED BY NERVE INJURY?
Electromyography in 75 patients


Peter H.J.M. Veldman, M.D. *
Dick M. Vingerhoets, M.D. **
R. Jan A. Goris M.D., Ph.D. *


* Department of Surgery, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands
* * Department of Clinical Neurophysiology University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy {RSD) has been considered as a pathological process developing after nerve trauma. 75 patients with RSD and neurologic signs and symptoms were investigated with EMG. In 40 patients, no disturbances were found. In 7 patients minor disturbances were present. In 28 patients, results indicated a compression neuropathy (11x), a nerve injury the luxating event of RSD (8) or other coexistent pathology. For patients with disturbances found on EMG, the results of EMG could never offer an explanation for all neurologic signs and symptoms present. As both clinical signs and symptoms and EMG findings can not be attributed to nerve trauma, we do not support the concept of a - mechanical - nerve injury as the universal cause of RSD. A locally produced toxic factor which damages all structures seems more probable. In this latter concept, etiologic events, character and distribution of the signs and symptoms in RSD can all be explained. Decreased specialized sensory functions can be attributed to damage of receptors, increased pain sensation to sensitized nociceptors and effects of sympathetic blockade to a-adrenergic sensitization. Toxic oxygen radicals produced in an inflammatory (re) action to trauma or surgery are a possible cause.

INTRODUCTION

Many aspects of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) are still unknown. The syndrome is characterized by regional pain, edema, changes in skin color and skin temperature, limited active range of motion and increase of these signs and symptoms after exercise. Many other signs and symptoms, especially neurologic disturbances, may be present. All structures can be affected and all functions lost (sensory, motor, sympathetic, hemodynamic) 33.

Most physicians consider RSD as a result of nerve trauma 5 22. In theories concerning pathophysiology of RSD, nerve trauma is the precipitating event leading to increased afference, crosstalk between nerves or sensitized wide dynamic range neurons and, as a consequence, increased efference or a vicious circle of ongoing activity. In that case one would expect alterations detected by EMG, showing impaired nerve conduction or signs of denervation or reinnervation. The purpose of this study is to report the results of EMG investigation performed in patients with RSD with neurologic complaints and to relate the findings to the pathogenesis of RSD.


PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since we instituted an outpatient clinic for RSD in november 1984, we have seen approximately 1500 patients - mostly referred from other departments or hospitals- with presumed or suspected diagnosis of RSD.


RSD has not been clearly defined in literature. The following criteria were used for diagnosis.

  1. 4 or 5 of:
    Unexplained diffuse pain
    Difference in skin color relative to other limb Diffuse edema
    Difference in skin temperature relative to other limb Limited active range of motion
  2. Occurrence or increase of above signs and symptoms after use
  3. Above signs and symptoms present in an area much larger than the area of primary injury or operation and including the area distal to the primary injury

These diagnostic criteria approximate those, utilized in other studies concerning RSD and are discussed in a previous report 33

Measuring nerve conduction and needle electromyographic examination was performed for various reasons but only when neurologic signs and symptoms were present.


RESULTS

75 patients fining into the criteria for RSD were investigated by EMG. In all patients, the classical signs and symptoms of RSD were accompanied by sensory or motor disturbances. Included were 21 male and 54 female patients. The median age was 40 years (15-83 years). RSD was present since 5 days to 10 years (median 8 months).


EMG was performed for various reasons. Results were related to the indication for performing EMG (table 7.1).

Nerve injury

In 14 patients EMG was performed to diagnose or rule out a nerve injury as the luxating event of RSD. In 5 patients, results were normal. In 1 patient minor disturbances were present; an ulnar nerve injury was suspected in a 37 year old male with RSD after fracture of the radial head. EMG demonstrated only a slightly decreased conduction velocity (41 m/sec) of the ulnar nerve located at the elbow, with normal distal sensory and motor latencies.


In 8 patients, the suspected nerve injury could be objectivated by EMG. The cause of RSD was injury of the peroneal nerve in 2 patients, brachial plexus injury in 2 patients, median nerve injury in 3 patients and multiple nerve injuries in 1 patient.

In all but one patient the nerve injury could be related to the cause of RSD: direct trauma, insufficient positioning during surgery, inadequately applied plaster of Paris or misplaced injection. In one patient, results were not completely understood: a 52 year old female, known to suffer from hypereosinophylic syndrome, demonstrated signs of polyneuropathia and denervation potentials in the muscles innervated by the median nerve.

Entrapment

In 28 patients EMG was performed because of suspected entrapment of the median nerve (23x), ulnar nerve (3x) radial nerve (lx) or medial tarsal nerve (l x). In 11 patients a carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) (decreased conduction velocity located at the wrist with or without denervation and/or reinnervation) was found. In the other 17 patients, EMG demonstrated no disturbances.


In one of the patients with clinical and electromyographic evidence of a CTS, RSD had developed after a carpal tunnel release; renewed EMG showed improved - but stilt impaired - conduction velocity with signs of reinnervation (polyphasic potentials). Release of the median nerve was advised to all patients with evidence of a CTS. One patient refused surgery Another patient was seen only once on behalf of a second opinion. In 9 patients a carpal tunnel release was performed. This cured the CTS related symptoms in 6 patients and also RSD in 2 patients. In 3 patients complaints before and after surgery were the same.

Radiculopathy

A (pseudo)radiculopathy was suspected in 9 patients.
In 4 patients results of EMG were normal. In 2 patients, minor disturbances were found. In one of these two patients, who underwent laminectomy four times, H-reflexes were absent without signs of denervation or fasciculation. In the second patient, H-reflexes were normal but the distal peroneal superficial nerve showed slightly decreased compound motor action potential (CMAP) and a slightly decreased conduction velocity (44 m/sec; normal >45 m/sec).


In 3 patients evidence of radiculopathy was found, but again, clinical signs and symptoms could not explain the findings on EMG.

RSD

In 5 patients EMG was performed because RSD was diagnosed and the consulted physician thought this could be objectivated with EMG. In 2 patients we found disturbances.


Table 7.1 Indications and results of EMG

indication n

results of EMG

normal
disturbed
minor disturbed
RSD 5 3 2
neurologic complaints
not understood
13 9 4
nerve injury 14 5 1 8
entrapment 28 17 11
radiculopathy 9 4 2 3
conversion 5 2 3
others 1 1

A 34 year old male with RSD of spontaneous origin in the left upper limb, had a slightly increased number of polyphasic potentials in both left and right deltoid muscles and in the left trapezoid muscle and a slightly decreased F-response over? the left ulnar nerve. Another patient, a 57 year old male, developed RSD in the left upper extremity after manipulation of the cervical spine, performed because of shoulder complaints. The EMG showed increased insertional acitivity in the biceps as well as the triceps muscle but not in the distal muscles of the extremity, and slightly impaired conduction of the median nerve at the level of the wrist on both sides, without signs of denervation. In both patients, the EMG disturbances could not be related to the loss of sensibility and the hyperpathia.

Neurologic signs and symptoms not understood

In 13 patients, EMG was performed because the neurologic complaints were not understood. The consulted physician could not relate the pain, sensory disturbances and/or paresis to a known disorder. No disturbances were found in 9 patients. In 4 patients, minor disturbances were found, which could not be related to the clinical symptoms. In patient 1, a minor conduction impairment of the ulnar nerve at the level of the elbow without denervation or reinnervation was found while clinically severe paresis of both flexor-and extensor-muscles in the forearm was present. In patient 2 who suffered from severe hypesthesy and hyperpathy, a few fibrillation potentials together with increased insertion was found. Patient 3, who complained of pain in the entire hand with hyperpathy, a minor increase in distal motor latency of the median nerve (4.7 msec) with normal conduction velocity at the level of the wrist (54 m/sec) was found. Increased insertion was present in the left and right anterior tibial muscles in patient 4 while RSD with severe sensory disurbances and paresis was present in only the left lower limb.

Conversion
In 5 patients, a conversion disorder was suspected and the consulted physician thought EMG was necessary to rule out other disorders. In a later stage we made the diagnosis RSD in all 5 patients. In 2 patients EMG examination was unrevealing, in 3 patients disturbances were found. In a 56 year old female suffering from RSD after a fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone, EMG showed polyphasic potentials in the muscles innervated by the peroneal nerve, as a sign of reinnervation. Probably an old nerve injury was present because of an inadequately applied plaster of Paris. Nevertheless, these results could not explain the severe pain, hypesthesy and severe paresis of extensor and flexor muscles. The second patient was a 40 year old female suffering from RSD in the left lower limb after an injection placed in the left gluteal area. EMG showed signs of polyneuropathy for which we found no cause. The third patient was a 31 year old female with a previous history of lumbar spondylodesis. At first, low back pain decreased but 1 year after surgery she developed RSD in the right lower limb. H-reflexes could not be elicited and signs of denervation were found in the muscles innervated by the 5th lumbar and first sacral nerve roots. The findings had improved in comparison with the EMG performed before surgery. As a consequence, these disturbances could not be related to the newly developed signs and symptoms, such as pseudoparalysis of foot- and ankle muscles, severe pain and hypesthesy and hyperpathy in a stockinglike area (exceeding dermatomes L5 and S1).

Others
In one patient with RSD and known to suffer from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis we found a radiculopathy


In 2 patients complaints increased after needle electrode investigation. One patient told us complaints temporarily decreased the days after EMG investigation.


DISCUSSION

Ever since the description of causalgia by Mitchell et al in 1864 25, many authors consider - sequelae of - nerve injury as the main pathogenetic factor of RSD. But, in many cases RSD results from minor injury in which nerve injury is not likely to occur and in 5 to 10% no precipitating event can be identified. Also the incidence of RSD after a proven nerve injury' and after a fracture of the distal radius without nerve lesions is both approximately 5% 4 21 26; one would expect a higher incidence of RSD after proven nerve injury.

Neurologic signs and symptoms in RSD

Sensory disturbances in RSD are frequent and consist of decreased sensation for touch (hypesthesy), temperature (hypothermesthesy) and position. In contrast, pain sensation is increased (hyperalgesy and hyperpathy). Also normally non-painful stimuli will be felt as pain (allodyny). In severe cases, anesthesia dolorosa (pain felt in an anesthetic area) may occur. Motor disturbances are also frequently found Paresis is invariably present, sometimes progressing until patients can not move actively at all (pseudoparalysis) 14 Incoordinated voluntary movements or involuntary movements, such as increased physiological tremor 6, dystonia 2  20 and localized muscle spasms are found infrequently 14 24 28 In most patients these signs and symptoms are not present at onset of RSD, but develop after a variable length of time.


The distribution pattern of motor and sensory disturbances in RSD is not limited to areas distributed by nerve roots or peripheral nerves. They are present in a glove- or stocking-like area. If nerve injury is present, the neurological disturbances are of course more prominent in the distribution area of that particular nerve, but they always exceed its borders. Thus the clinical symptoms fit best in a concept of a regional polyneuropathy.

Electromyography in RSD

Electromyographic findings in RSD have been reported in a few studies Dumoulin reported increased distal latency with polyphasic potentials without signs of denervation and normal conduction velocity in some (number of patients not reported) of 22 patients 9. Doury 8 reported decreased conduction velocities of sensory and/or motor nerves in 9 of 17 patients with RSD. Uematsu found decreased conduction velocity and/or fibrillations in 5 of 32 patients with RSD 32 Unfortunately these studies have poor diagnostic criteria for RSD and the EMG-findings are not related to the clinical signs and symptoms. Especially no remarks are made concerning the possibility of nerve injury or entrapment neuropathy. Hyman et al 19 reported normal somatosensory evoked potentials after median nerve stimulation in S patients with cold RSD. Doury suggested that early electromyograms would show anomalies more frequently, but this was never proven 8.

RSD as a complication of carpal tunnel release has been reported 11. Stein reported 6 patients with CTS and RSD after distal radis fractures or a stab wound surrounding the median nerve 30. Carpal tunnel release or adhaesiolysis releaved all complaints. Grundberg 16 saw nerve compression syndromes in 22 patients with therapy resistant RSD; this was confirmed with EMG in most patients. Decompression improved the complaints in all patients. We found compression syndromes too, but only in a minority of patients. Decompression releaved the compression-related complaints in 6 of 9 patients and also cured RSD in 2 patients. Thus in 7 of 9 patients, decompression of the median nerve could not cure the RSD, which suggests that the CTS was not the cause of RSD.

In all patients in this study, there was a discrepancy between the severe and often impressive neurologic complaints on one hand, and the absence of obvious disturbances on EMG on the other hand. EMG could never adequately explain the motor and sensory disturbances found on physical examination. One would expect decreased conduction velocities or fibrillation potentials and positive waves, as signs of denervation, or polyphasic potentials as a sign of reinnervation. In our highly selected patients - only those with neurologic symptoms were investigated by EMG - EMG was of no value in explaining the neurologic signs and symptoms. As classical EMG is very sensitive in testing large diameter nerve fibers (motor and Ab-sensibility) we conclude that these fibers are not disturbed in RSD. Unfortunately, conventional EMG can not detect disturbances of small sensory or autonomic fibers 10. Autonomic function in the extremities can not be tested reliably at this moment 29 We do not know if and how these fibers are (dys) functioning. On the other hand, these fibers are not considered to conduct motor function and epicritic sensibility, which are both disturbed in RSD.

Pathogenesis of RSD

Many authors consider - partial - nerve injury and its sequelae as the cause of RSD. As stated above, analyzing the precipitating events does not support this hypothesis. Also the character, distribution and development of clinical neurological signs and symptoms in RSD do not support the concept of a nerve injury, but fit in the concept of a unilateral regional polyneuropathy. If mechanical nerve injury would be the cause of RSD, large diameter fibers should be the first to dysfunction, and this can be objectivated with EMG. This study showed no or minor abnormalities in EMG recordings. So we do not consider - mechanical - nerve injury as the cause of RSD.

More probably, a more peripheral lesion - at cellular level - is responsible.


A locally produced toxic factor may be the cause of damage. Such a metabolic pathogenesis explains why neurological signs and symptoms are of a stocking- or glovelike distribution, as these factors are locally produced and therefore result in regional damage not related to a peripheral nerve or nerve segment. These factors can damage receptors and in this way explain how sensibility for touch, thermal stimuli and propriocepsis are decreased (chemodenervation). Damage to nociceptors can result in increased sensitivity 17. Cline et al have proven that chronic hyperalgesia in RSD is caused by chronic sensitization of the C polymodal nociceptors 3. Others reported a-adrenergic sensitivity 17 23, which explains spontaneous pain and increased pain sensation after mechanical- and thermal stimuli and after sympathetic arousal. These disturbances can not be objectivated by EMG.

This hypothesis also explains how sympathetic blocks can - temporarily -releave pain, but are not permanently successful. As there is increased a-adrenergic sensitivity, circulating catecholamines and those which are locally produced by sympathetic efferents, can activate these damaged nociceptors and in this way aggravate pain. Blocking sympathetic stimuli prevents excess stimulation but can not take away the abnormal sensitivity.


In RSD all structures and functions are damaged. In a previous study 33 we regrouped signs and symptoms of RSD and found that in the early stage signs of inflammation are the most prominent. Toxic oxygen radicals, locally produced in an - exaggerated - inflammatory (re) action, can very well explain the signs and symptoms found in RSD. Other reports support this concept. For instance, RSD is characterized by increased permeability for macromolecules 27 and impaired oxygen metabolism 12 18, Also accumulation of lipofuscin - a product of lipid peroxidation by toxic oxygen radicals - can be found in longstanding RSD 31 and scavengers of oxygen radicals are therapeutically successful 13 15


We do not know why RSD-patients react to trauma or surgery with an increased production of toxic oxygen radicals.


CONCLUSION

We conclude that EMG is not useful in establishing the diagnosis RSD, because the peripheral nerve functions seem to be intact in most patients. For RSD patients, EMG can be helpful when accompanying compresson syndromes are present or nerve injury as a luxating event of RSD is suspected.


The results of this study are in accordance with our previous stated opnion that RSD has a metabolic pathogenesis. Damage to receptors by toxic oxygen radicals can explain both neurologic signs and symptoms and the absence of electromyographic disturbances.


REFERENCES

1. Arnold JMO, Teasell RW, MacLeod AP, Brown JE, Carruthers SG. Increased venous alphaadrenoceptor responsiveness in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:619-21.

2. Bhatia KP, Bhatt MH, Marsden CD. The causalgia - dystonia syndrome. Brain 1993; 116: 843-51.

3. Cline MA, Ochoa J, Torebjork E. Chronic hyperalgesia and skin wariming caused by sensitized C nociceptors. Brain 1989:112:621-47.

4. de Bruijn HP. Functional treatment of Colles fractures. A prospective clinical study. Meastricht: Thesis 1987.

5. deTakats G. Sympathetic reflex dystrophy. Med Clin North Am 1965; 49:117-29.

6. Deuschl G, Blumberg H, Lucking CH. Tremor in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Arch Neurol
1991; 48:1247-52.

7. Devor M. Nerve pathophysiology and mechanisms of pain in causalgia. J Autonom Nerv Syst 1983:7:371-84.

8. Doury P, Dirheimer V, Pattin S. Algodystrophy. Diagnosis and therapy of a frequent disease of the locomotor apparatus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York. 1981.

9. Dumoulin Md. Etude electrologique des modifications musculaires au cours de l'oste'oporose post-traumatique. Bull Acad Roy Med (Paris) 1974:158: 328-33.

10. Dyck PJ. Limitations in predicting pathologic abnormality of nerves from the EMG examination. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13:371-5.

11. Fitzcharles MA, Esdaile JM. Carpal tunnel syndrome complicated by reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome; Br J Rheumatol 1991:30:468-70.

12. Goris RJA. Conditions associated with impaired oxygen extraction. In Gutierez C, Vincent JL (eds}. Tissue Oxygen Utilization. Berlin, Springer VerIag 1991:350-69.

13. Goris RJA. Treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy with hydroxyl radical scavengers. Unfallchirurg 1985:88:330-2.

14. Goris RJA, Reynen JA, Veldman PHJM, De klinische versohunselen bij posttraumatische dystrofie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1990:134:2138-41

15. Goris RJA, van Dongen LM, winters HAH. Are toxic oxygen radicals involved in the pathogenesis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy? Free Rad Res Comm 1987:3:13-8.

16. Grundberg AB, Reagan DS. Compression syndromes in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. J Hand Surg (Am) 1991:16:731-6..

17. Handwerker HO. Electrophysiological mechanisms in inflammatory pain. Agents and actions 1991; 32: Supplemental-a.

18. Heerschap A, den Hollander JA, Reynen H, Cons RJA. Metabolic changes in reflex sympathetic dystrophy: A 31P NMR spectroscopy study. Muscle Nerve 1993:16:367-73.

19. Hyman SA, Parris WCV, Prysi NH, Skelley C, Lindsey K. Somatosensory evoked potentials are unchanged by reflex sympathetic dystrophy and by stellate ganglion block. Clin J Pain 1991:7:226-9.

20. Jankovic J, van der Linden C. Dystonia and tremor induced by peripheral trauma: predisposing factors, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51:512-9.

21. Jebara VA, Saade B. Causalgia: a wartime experience - report of twenty treated cases.               J. Trauma 1987:27:519-24.

22. Livingstone WK. Pain mechanisms. A physiologic interpretation of causalgia and its related states, 1943. Reprinted in 1976 by New York, Plenum Press.

23. Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Ieracitano D, Canal N. Sensitized nociceptors in reflex sympathetic dystrophies. Funct Neurol 1989; 4:135-40.

24. Marsden CD, Obeso JA, Traub MM, Rothwell JC, Kranz H, Is Cruz F. Muscle spasms associated with Sudeck's atrophy after injury. Br Med J 1984; 288:173-6.

25. Mitchell SW, Morehouse GR, Keen WW,. Gunshot wounds and other injures of nerves. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott & Co 1864.

26. Omer CC, Thomas MS. Treatment of causalgia. Tex Med 1971:67:93-6.

27. Oyen WJG, Arntz IF, Claessens RAMJ, van der Meer JWM, Corstens FHM, Goris RJA. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the hand: An excessive inflammatory response? Pain 1993; 55:151-7

28. Schwartzman RJ, Kerrigan J. The movement disorder of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Neurology 1990; 40:57-61.

29. Shahani B, Halperin JJ. Boulu P, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response- a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536-42.

30. Stein AH. The relation of median nerve compression to Sudeck's syndrome. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962; 115:713-20.

31. Tilman PBJ. Stadhouders AM, Jap PHK, Goris RJA. Histopathologic findings in skeletal muscle tissue of patients suffering from reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Micron Microscop Acta 1990; 21:271-2.

32. Uematsu S. Hendler N, Hungerford D, Long D, Ono N. Thermography and electromyography in the differential diagnosis of chronic pain syndromes and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 21:165-82.

33. Veldman PHJM, Reynen HM, Arntz IF, Goris RJA. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet 1993; 342:1012-6.

GO TO NEXT ARTICLE

Send e-mail to EricmP9512@aol.com with questions or comments about this web site. Copyright © 1997 International Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Foundation. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system other than this specific media, transcribed, or translated into any language without the expressed written permission from Eric M. Phillips and CMNE. This material is for informational and education purposes. It is not meant to take the place of your physician. Before starting, changing, or stopping any treatments or medicines consult your physician. The contents of this media have been reprinted with the express written permission from the authors.
Last modified: August 1, 1999

The material on the IRSDF Homepage and all its associated, linked or reference pages is for informational and education purposes. It is not meant to take the place of your physician. Before starting, changing, or stopping any treatments or medicines consult your physician. Eric M. Phillips, and Associates will not be held liable for any damage or loss as a result of information provided on this page or associated documentation. Again, this WEBSITE is simply published as an information source and should not be used to treat or make judgments on RSD. All material owned by others, that is distributed or published on this website, disk media, facsimile or copied through electronic or photographic means has been done so with the permission of the owner or author. Any and all material published in error, will be immediately removed or corrected upon notification of such. The IRSDF organization title known as the "International Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Foundation" and all associated material on this website may not be copied, reproduced or quoted without expressed written permission from the owner;  Copyright ©1996-2008 Eric M. Phillips- Last Update 1/4/2001

Back Home Next